Translation and Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory-13
Pages 153-161
Seyed Hossein Hosseini, Moslem Cheraghifard, Akram Azad, Ghorban Taghizadeh, Laleh Lajevardi
Abstract Background: Stroke survivors often experience functional limitations, particularly impairments affecting the upper extremities. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI-13) in individuals with stroke.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 105 patients with stroke and 10 experts participated. The CAHAI-13 was translated into Persian following the IQOLA protocol. Participants completed the CAHAI-13 along with the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), and Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE). The study evaluated content validity, construct validity, convergent and divergent validity, known-groups validity, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and inter-rater reliability.
Results: Expert evaluations indicated that the Persian version of the CAHAI-13 demonstrated satisfactory content validity. Significant positive correlations were observed between the CAHAI-13 and the ARAT (r = 0.84), WMFT (r = 0.91), and FMA-UE (r = 0.74) (P < 0.001), supporting its convergent validity. Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a one-factor structure with an acceptable model fit in the stroke population. The instrument also demonstrated strong known-groups validity (F = 123.36, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the CAHAI-13 showed excellent internal consistency (α = 0.96), good test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.85), and excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.93).
Conclusion: The findings suggest that the Persian version of the CAHAI-13 is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing upper-extremity function in stroke survivors and can be used effectively in both clinical practice and research settings.














