Document Type : Original Articles

Authors

1 Department of Counseling, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

2 Department of Political Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

10.30476/jrsr.2025.106689.1572

Abstract

Background: Sign language is a complex and rich language that enables people with hearing impairments to communicate through a shared language of interaction. This study aimed to explore occupational experiences in Iranian Sign Language interpreting (SLI).
Methods: Fifty-four participants, including sign language interpreters and individuals with hearing impairments, were interviewed. The data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Four main themes emerged from the data: SLI as a blessing, necessities, challenges, and needs.
Results: The findings highlighted the vital role of sign language interpreters in facilitating communication between deaf and hearing individuals. However, because sign language interpreting is not officially recognized as a profession in Iran, only a small number of interpreters receive a regular salary. The majority work either voluntarily or for minimal charitable compensation. In addition, most interpreters lack access to employment benefits such as health insurance and retirement plans.
Conclusion: The findings demonstrate the need for policies that formally recognize sign language interpreting as a profession, provide interpreters with the necessary training on occupational risks and risk management, and improve their employment conditions and professional status.

Keywords

  1. Brown N. Deafness and hearing loss in higher education. InLived Experiences of Ableism in Academia 2021 May 25 (pp. 141-158). Policy Press.
  2. Neumann K, Chadha S, Tavartkiladze G, Bu X, White KR. Newborn and infant hearing screening facing globally growing numbers of people suffering from disabling hearing loss. International Journal of Neonatal Screening. 2019 Jan 18;5(1):7.
  3. Szarkowski A. Deaf and Hard of Hearing. In: Ponsford J, editor. Practical Psychology in Medical Rehabilitation. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 147-54.
  4. Rastgoo R, Kiani K, Escalera S. Sign language recognition: A deep survey. Expert Systems with Applications. 2021;164:113794.
  5. Napier J. Comparing signed and spoken language interpreting. The Routledge handbook of interpreting. 2015 Feb 20:129-40.
  6. Brentari D. Sign languages: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
  7. Haualand H. Sign language interpreting: A human rights issue. International Journal of Interpreter Education. 2009;1(1):7.
  8. Adigun OT. Burnout among sign language interpreters in Africa. Journal of Gender, Information and Development in Africa (JGIDA). 2019;8(3):91-109.
  9. Humphrey CN. Job satisfaction, role strain, burnout, and self-care among American Sign Language/English interpreters (Doctoral dissertation, Western Oregon University).
  10. Mariam AA, Qandeel N. Relationship between job satisfaction, burnout, and years of experience among Jordanian sign language interpreters. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture. 2023;34:2555–79-–79.
  11. Graves JM, Ross N, Gonzalez C, Moore M, Denson V, Vavilala MS. Compassion and Trauma: Occupational Health Experiences of Certified Medical Interpreters in Five US States. Workplace Health & Safety. 2023:21650799231167586.
  12. Moradi-Joo E, Barouni M, Vali L, Mahmoudian S. Qualitative Analysis of Newborn Hearing Screening Program in Iran. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2024;38:23.
  13. Braun V, Clarke V. Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative psychology. 2022 Feb;9(1):3.
  14. Willig C, Rogers WS, editors. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology. Sage; 2017 Mar 31.
  15. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. The constructivist credo: Routledge; 2016.
  16. De Meulder M, Haualand H. Sign language interpreting services: A quick fix for inclusion? Translation and Interpreting Studies. 2021;16(1):19-40.
  17. McCartney JL. Is grit the'X-factor'for interpreters leaving the profession? Translation & Interpreting, The. 2016;8(1):30-51.
  18. Burhani ZMA, Prasetyo J. The Sign Language Interpreting Gloves. Journal of Applied Science and Advanced Engineering. 2023;1(1):18-27.
  19. Choubsaz Y, Crasborn O, Siyavoshi S, Soleimanbeigi F, editors. Documenting the Use of Iranian Sign Language (ZEI) in Kermanshah. Proceedings of the LREC2022 10th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Multilingual Sign Language Resources; 2022.
  20. Shin JC, Jung J. Academics job satisfaction and job stress across countries in the changing academic environments. Higher education. 2014;67:603-20.
  21. Bantekas I, Anastasiou D, Stein MA. UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Oxford University Press, Incorporated; 2018.
  22. Burke TB. Choosing accommodations: Signed language interpreting and the absence of choice. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 2017;27(2):267-99.