Document Type : Original Articles
Authors
1 Department of Audiology and speech Language Pathology, National Institute of Speech and Hearing, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
2 Department of Neurodevelopmental Sciences National Institute of Speech and Hearing, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
3 Department of Social work National Institute of Speech and Hearing, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
4 National Institute of Speech and Hearing, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
Abstract
Background:
Studies on telerehabilitation in India have primarily addressed the clinicians’ perspective. Therefore, this study aimed to understand the perspectives of clients—specifically adults who stutter—regarding telerehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Method
A mixed-methods survey, combining interviews and self-report questionnaires, explored client perspectives on telerehabilitation for adults who stutter during the pandemic. Twelve adults who stutter aged 18 to 40 attending telerehabilitation sessions at a tertiary rehabilitation center participated in the study.
Results
All participants expressed comfort in discussing their problems and anxieties with the clinician during teletherapy sessions. Additionally, 91.7% (n = 11) reported feeling confident in managing the online platform. Of the participants, 66.7% (n = 8) rated the sessions as excellent, while 33.3% (n = 4) rated them as good. Preferences regarding session modes were evenly split, with 50% favoring teletherapy and the other 50% preferring a hybrid approach. The majority of participants considered avoiding travel during the pandemic to be a significant advantage of telerehabilitation. However, internet connectivity issues were identified as a major disadvantage.
Conclusion
The findings of this study highlight both the advantages and challenges of telerehabilitation for adults who stutter. Participants reported that telerehabilitation helped improve their speech fluency and proved a viable and effective approach for addressing stuttering during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Keywords
- American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Audiologists providing clinical services via telepractice: Position statement.
- Cottrell M, Burns CL, Jones A, Rahmann A, Young A, Sam S, Cruickshank M, Pateman K. Sustaining allied health telehealth services beyond the rapid response to COVID-19: learning from patient and staff experiences at a large quaternary hospital. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2021 Dec;27(10):615–24.
- Rao PK. Tele speech-language pathology and audiology in India—A short report. Journal of the International Society for Telemedicine and eHealth. 2018 Nov 11;6:e19-1.
- Mohan HS, Anjum A, Rao PK. A survey of telepractice in speech-language pathology and audiology in India. International Journal of Telerehabilitation. 2017;9(2):69.
- Aggarwal K, Patel R, Ravi R. Uptake of telepractice among speech-language therapists following COVID-19 pandemic in India. Speech, Language and Hearing. 2021 Oct;24(4):228–34.
- Vrinda R, Reni SP. Telerehabilitation in the field of speech language pathology during pandemic COVID-19 outbreak—An analysis in Kerala. Bioscience Biotechnology Research Communications. 2020;13(4):1–21.
- World Health Organization. The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Health Related Problems ICD-10: Tenth Revision. Volume 1: Tabular List. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.
- Barnett YD. Exploring telepractice for stuttering: A case study. 2020
- Eslami Jahromi M, Ahmadian L, Bahaadinbeigy K. The effect of tele-speech therapy on treatment of stuttering. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2020;15:1–6.
- McGill M, Noureal N, Siegel J. Telepractice treatment of stuttering: A systematic review. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2019;25(5):359–68.
- Valentine DT. Stuttering intervention in three service delivery models (direct, hybrid, and telepractice): Two case studies. International Journal of Telerehabilitation. 2014;6(2):51.
- Bayati B, Ayatollahi H. Comprehensive review of factors influencing the use of telepractice in stuttering treatment. Healthcare Informatics Research. 2021;27(1):57–66.
- Kully D. Telehealth in speech pathology: Applications to the treatment of stuttering. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2000;6(2_suppl):39–41.
- Langevin M, Lomheim H, Williston H. Teleparticipation in a group stuttering treatment program: Perspectives of clients and student speech-language pathologists. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;193:347–8.
- Cangi ME, Toğram B. Stuttering therapy through telepractice in Turkey: A mixed method study. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 2020;66:105793.
- McGill M, Siegel J, Noureal N. A preliminary comparison of in-person and telepractice evaluations of stuttering. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2021;1–3.
- McGill M, Cullen L, Webb H. Clients' experiences of telepractice for stuttering. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups. 2019;4(3):553–62.
- Riley G. SSI-4 Stuttering Severity Instrument Fourth Edition. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 2009.
- Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101.
- Reni PS, Vrinda R, Kunnath SK, George VM. A brief report on telerehabilitation during COVID-19 outbreak at a tertiary care center in Kerala, India. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal. 2023;21(2):375–8.
- Sommer M, Waltersbacher A, Schlotmann A, Schröder H, Strzelczyk A. Prevalence and therapy rates for stuttering, cluttering, and developmental disorders of speech and language: Evaluation of German health insurance data. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2021;15:176.
- Drayna D, Kilshaw J, Kelly J. The sex ratio in familial persistent stuttering. American Journal of Human Genetics. 1999;65(5):1473.
- Digital India Program. Digital empowerment of citizens [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jan 19]. Available from: https://www.digitalindia.gov.in/content/vision-and-vision-areas#collapseone--14
- Mitra A, Singh P. Human capital attainment and gender empowerment: The Kerala paradox. Social Science Quarterly. 2007;88(5):1227–42.
- Sharma S, Ward EC, Burns C, Theodoros D, Russell T. Assessing dysphagia via telerehabilitation: Patient perceptions and satisfaction. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2013;15(2):176–83.
- Cranen K, Veld RH, Ijzerman M, Vollenbroek-Hutten M. Change of patients' perceptions of telemedicine after brief use. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2011;17(7):530–5.
- Wilkie T, Beilby J. Post-treatment stuttering severity under different assessment conditions. Australian Journal of Human Communication Disorders. 1996;24(1):19–27.
- Alm PA. Stuttering in relation to anxiety, temperament, and personality: Review and analysis with focus on causality. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 2014;40:5–21.
- Freckmann A, Hines M, Lincoln M. Clinicians’ perspectives of therapeutic alliance in face-to-face and telepractice speech–language pathology sessions. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2017;19(3):287–96.
- Kruse CS, Krowski N, Rodriguez B, Tran L, Vela J, Brooks M. Telehealth and patient satisfaction: A systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open. 2017;7(8):e016242.
- Global Threat Report. Kerala climate [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jan 19]. Available from: https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/india/kerala-climate.htm
)