Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences & Research

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

News

Effects of Kinesthetic Imagery, Active and Combined Exercises on the Electromyographic Pattern of Hip Hyperextension and Tests of Relation with Lumbar Hyperlordosis

Document Type : Original Articles

Authors

1 Corrective Exercise and Sports Pathology, Pardis Alborz of Tehran University, Tehran, Iran

2 Faculty of Physical Education Tehran University, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Health and Sport Medicine, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Abstract:
Background: Mental exercise uses the same neuronal pathways involved in physical exercise to modify the pattern and function without the stress caused by physical exercise. This study investigated the effects of the three methods of kinesthetic imagery, active, and combined exercise (imagery and active) on the pattern of hip hyperextension and the strength of selected muscle of lumbo-pelvic in women with lumbar hyperlordosis.
Method: In this semi-experimental study, 36 women with lumbar hyperlordosis (age: 34.47±3.79, height: 160.48±12.63, weight: 64.46±18.26) were sorted into three groups. The groups practiced three sessions per week for six weeks. The degree of lumbar lordosis using flexible ruler, electromyographic activity of the lumbo-pelvic muscles during hip hyperextension in the prone position using surface electromyogram, the strength of the gluteus maximus during hip hyperextention using dynamometer, the strength of abdominal muscles during lowering two legs test using goniometer, flexibility of hip flexor muscles during the Thomas test using goniometer, and flexibility of erector spine muscles during the Schober test using a meter were measured before and after the intervention. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used for normality of data, and the repeated measures variance test was used for the statistical analysis of data at a significance level of 0.05.
Results: The results showed a significant difference between the three methods of kinesthetic imagery, active and combined (p -value = 0.001). There was a significant difference between the method of imagery exercise and the methods of active and combined exercise, but no significant difference was observed between the methods of active and combined exercise.
Conclusion: Imagery exercises were effective in modifying the electromyographic activity of some lumbo-pelvic muscles (gluteus maximus and rectus femoris muscles); however, they did not have a significant effect on the strength, flexibility, or degree of lumbar lordosis. Combined exercise was as effective as active exercise in modifying the electromyographic activity of the lumbo-pelvic muscles, the strength of the abdominal and gluteus maximus muscles, and the flexibility of erector spine and hip flexor muscles.

Keywords

References

  1.  

    1. Sahrmann S. Diagnosis and Treatment of Movement Impairment Syndromes-E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013 Sep 27.
    2. Page P, Frank CC, Lardner R. Assessment and treatment of muscle imbalance: the Janda approach. Champaign, IL: Human kinetics; 2010.
    3. Kalantari AA, Karimi N, Arab AM, Jaberzadeh S. The effects of active therapeutic exercises on the electromyographic activity of lumbopelvic muscles during prone hip extension in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. Physical Treatments-Specific Physical Therapy Journal. 2014 Oct 10; 4(3):145-52.
    4. Ghamkhar L. Evaluation of the effect of abdominal maneuvers on the lumbar-pelvic region muscle in patients with chronic low back pain during hip extension. Master's Thesis, University of Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences. 2010. [Persian]
    5. Sahrmann SA. Posture and muscle imbalance: faulty lumbar-pelvic alignment and associated musculoskeletal pain syndromes. Orthop Div Rev. 1992 Nov; 1992:13-20.
    6. Oh JS, Cynn HS, Won JH, Kwon OY, Yi CH. Effects of performing an abdominal drawing-in maneuver during prone hip extension exercises on hip and back extensor muscle activity and amount of anterior pelvic tilt. Journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy. 2007 Jun; 37(6):320-4.
    7. Park KN, Cynn HS, Kwon OY, Lee WH, Ha SM, Kim SJ, Weon JH. Effects of the abdominal drawing-in maneuver on muscle activity, pelvic motions, and knee flexion during active prone knee flexion in patients with lumbar extension rotation syndrome. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2011 Sep 1; 92(9):1477-83.
    8. Cornwall MW, Bruscato MP, Barry S. Effect of mental practice on isometric muscular strength. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 1991 May; 13(5):231-4.
    9. Ranganathan VK, Siemionow V, Liu JZ, Sahgal V, Yue GH. From mental power to muscle power-gaining strength by using the mind. Neuropsychologia. 2004 Jan 1; 42(7):944-56.
    10. Frenkel MO, Herzig DS, Gebhard F, Mayer J, Becker C, Einsiedel T. Mental practice maintains range of motion despite forearm immobilization: a pilot study in healthy persons. Journal of rehabilitation medicine. 2014 Mar 5; 46(3):225-32.
    11. Guillot A, Lebon F, Rouffet D, Champely S, Doyon J, Collet C. Muscular responses during motor imagery as a function of muscle contraction types. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2007 Oct 1; 66(1):18-27.
    12. Gravetter F J. Research methods for the behavioral sciences, Translated by: Rezaei A. 3 rd ed, 2009.
    13. Lebon F, Guillot A, Collet C. Increased muscle activation following motor imagery during the rehabilitation of the anterior cruciate ligament. Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback. 2012 Mar 1; 37(1):45-51.
    14. Christakou A, Zervas Y. The effectiveness of imagery on pain, edema, and range of motion in athletes with a grade II ankle sprain. Physical Therapy in Sport. 2007 Aug 1; 8(3):130-40.
    15. Hoyek N, Di Rienzo F, Collet C, Hoyek F, Guillot A. The therapeutic role of motor imagery on the functional rehabilitation of a stage II shoulder impingement syndrome. Disability and rehabilitation. 2014 Jun 1; 36(13):1113-9.
    16. Nourbakhsh MR, Arabloo AM, Salavati M. The relationship between pelvic cross syndrome and chronic low back pain. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. 2006 Jan 1; 19(4):119-28.
    17. Hojati H. Determine the validity and reliability of the Persian version of motion imagery 3. Master's Thesis, University of Tehran. 2013. [Persian]
    18. Youdas JW, Suman VJ, Garrett TR. Reliability of measurements of lumbar spine sagittal mobility obtained with the flexible curve. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 1995 Jan; 21(1):13-20.
    19. Saidi F. Relation of lumbar pelvic muscles strength with scale of lumbar arch. Master's Thesis, University of Tehran. 2007. [Persian]
    20. Kendall PH. Exercises for backache: a double-blind controlled trial. Physiotherapy. 1968; 54:154-7.
    21. Williams JG, Odley JL, Callaghan M. Motor imagery boosts proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation in the attainment and retention of range-of-motion at the hip joint. Journal of sports science & medicine. 2004 Sep; 3(3):160.
    22. Reiser M, Büsch D, Munzert J. Strength gains by motor imagery with different ratios of physical to mental practice. Frontiers in Psychology. 2011 Aug 19; 2:194.
    23. Yao WX, Ranganathan VK, Allexandre D, Siemionow V, Yue GH. Kinesthetic imagery training of forceful muscle contractions increases brain signal and muscle strength. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2013 Sep 26; 7:561.
    24. Levine D, Walker JR, Tillman LJ. The effect of abdominal muscle strengthening on pelvic tilt and lumbar lordosis. Physiotherapy theory and practice. 1997 Jan 1; 13(3):217-26.
    25. Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Hodges PW. Changes in recruitment of the abdominal muscles in people with low back pain: ultrasound measurement of muscle activity. Spine. 2004 Nov 15; 29(22):2560-6.
    26. Lebon F, Collet C, Guillot A. Benefits of motor imagery training on muscle strength. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2010 Jun 1; 24(6):1680-7.
    27. Alvim FC, Peixoto JG, Vicente EJ, Chagas PS, Fonseca DS. Influences of the extensor portion of the gluteus maximus muscle on pelvic tilt before and after the performance of a fatigue protocol. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2010 May 1; 14(3):206-13.
    28. MassoudArab A, RezaNourbakhsh M, Mohammadifar A. The relationship between hamstring length and gluteal muscle strength in individuals with sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy. 2011 Feb 1; 19(1):5-10.
    29. Kumar VK, Chakrapani M, Kedambadi R. Motor imagery training on muscle strength and gait performance in ambulant stroke subjects-a randomized clinical trial. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2016 Mar; 10(3):YC01.
    30. Dickstein R, Deutsch JE. Motor imagery in physical therapist practice. Physical therapy. 2007 Jul 1; 87(7):942-53.
    31. Vergeer I, Roberts J. Movement and stretching imagery during flexibility training. Journal of sports sciences. 2006 Feb 1; 24(2):197-208.
    32. ROWENA MT. The interrelation of spinal curves, pelvic tilt and muscle lengths in the adolescent female. The Australian journal of physiotherapy. 1986; 32(1):7.
    33. Masuda T, Miyamoto K, Oguri K, Matsuoka T, Shimizu K. Relationship between the thickness and hemodynamics of the erector spinae muscles in various lumbar curvatures. Clinical Biomechanics. 2005 Mar 1; 20(3):247-53.

     

Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences & Research
Volume 8, Issue 1
March 2021
Pages 1-11
Files
Share
How to cite
Statistics