Document Type : Original Articles
Authors
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
Abstract
Background: The eye is one of the most vital organs of human body, and glaucoma is the second-leading cause of blindness after cataracts in the world. However, glaucoma is the leading cause of preventable blindness. The main objective of this study is to investigate intraocular pressure (IOP), stress, strain, and deformation in the retina in early stages of glaucoma.
Methods: In this study, a model of the human eye is numerically investigated. The aqueous humor pressure is considered as 30, 35, and 40 mmHg and compared with normal eye pressure. The problem is considered as transient 3D and accurate. Comparison between obtained results shows that the model has been applied. Eye components are also considered with their real properties. Due to the inappreciable effects of turbulence and temperature variation, these effects have been neglected. To determine the pressure field, a two-way fluid-structure interaction is applied, and then, the results are used in a one-way fluid-structure interaction to determine the amount of stress, strain, and deformation of the retina.
Results: The maximum deformation in the retina of a glaucoma patient is about 0.33 mm higher than a normal eye, the maximum stress is about 1,300 Pa higher than a normal eye, and the maximum strain is about 0.06 higher than a normal eye.
Conclusion: In patients with increased IOP, the amount of deformation in the retina has increased, and the maximum deformation occurs near the optic disc in all cases. Furthermore, maximum stress and maximum strain occur at the place of maximum deformation.
Keywords
of the healthy adults. J Ophthalmol 2014; Article ID 503645.
2. Tan CS, Ouyang Y, Ruiz H, Sadda SR. Diurnal variation of
choroidal thickness in normal, healthy subjects measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 2012; 53: 261-266.
3. Broquet J, Roy S, Mermoud A. Visualization of the aqueous
outflow pathway in the glaucoma surgery by finite element model
of the eye. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2005; 8
(1): 43-44.
4. Akhmanova MA, Domogatsky SP, Evgrafov VY. Computer
simulation of hydraulic flows in the human eye. Biophysics 2011;
56 (1): 108-113.
5. Can OF. Exposure of the human eye to wind. Biocybern Biomed
Eng 2016; 36 (1): 130-137.
6. Heys JJ, Barocas VH. A boussinesq model of natural convection
in the human eye and the formation of Krukenberg’s spindle. Ann
Biomed Eng 2002; 30 (3): 392-401.
7. Cicekli U. Computational model for heat transfer in the human
eye using the finite element method [dissertation]. Agricultural
and Mechanical College, Louisiana State Univ.; 2003.
8. Ng EY, Ooi EH. FEM simulation of the eye structure with bioheat
analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2006; 82 (3):
268-276.
9. Ng EY, Ooi EH. Simulation of aqueous humor hydrodynamics in
human eye heat transfer. Comput Biol Med 2008; 38 (2): 252-262.
10. Villamarin A, Roy S, Hasballa R, Vardoulis O, Reymond P,
Stergiopulos N. 3D simulation of the aqueous flow in the human
eye. Med Eng Phys 2012; 34 (10): 1462-1470.
11. Norman RE, Flanagan JG, Sigal IA, Rausch SMK, Tertinegg I.
Finite element modeling of the human sclera: Influence on optic
nerve head biomechanics and connections with glaucoma. Exp
Eye Res 2011; 93 (1): 4-12.
12. Sigal IA, Flanagan JG, Tertinegg I, Ethier CR. Finite Element
Modeling of Optic Nerve Head Biomechanics. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 2004; 45: 4378-4387.
13. Wang X, Beotra MR, Tun TA, Baskaran M, Perera S, Aung T,
et al. In vivo 3-dimensional strain mapping confirms large optic
nerve head deformations following horizontal eye movements.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016; 57: 5825-5833.
14. Tsai JC. High Eye Pressure and Glaucoma. Glaucoma Research
Foundation 2015 September. Available from: http://www.
glaucoma.org/gleams/high-eye-pressure-and-glaucoma.php
15. Mauro A, Massarotti N, Salahudeen M, Romano MR, Romano
V, Nithiarasu P. A generalised porous medium approach to study
thermo-fluid dynamics in human eyes. Med Biol Eng Comput
2018; 56 (10): 1823-1839.
16. Thijssen JM, Mol HJM, Timmer MR. Acoustic parameters of
ocular tissues. Ultrasound Med Biol 1985; 11 (1): 157-161.
17. Donati S, Caprani SM, Airaghi G, Vinciguerra R, Bartalena L,
Testa F, et al. Vitreous substitutes: The present and the future.
Biomed Res Int 2014; Article ID 351804.
18. Phillips JR, McBrien NA. Form deprivation myopia: elastic
properties of sclera. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1995; 15 (5): 357-362.
19. Battaglioli JL, Kamm RD. Measurements of the compressive
properties of scleral tissue. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual
Science. Invest. Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1984; 25 (1): 59-65.
20. Friberg TR, Lace JW. A comparison of the elastic properties of
human choroid and sclera. Exp Eye Res 1988; 47 (3): 429-436.
21. Jones IL, Warner M, Stevens JD. Mathematical modelling of the
elastic properties of retina: a determination of Young’s modulus.
Eye 1992; 556-559.
22. Franze K, Francke M, Gunter K, Christ AF, Korber N, Reichenbach
A, et al. Spatial mapping of the mechanical properties of the living
retina using scanning force microscopy. Soft Matter 2011; 7 (7):
3025-3652.
23. Heys J, Barocas VH. Mechanical characterization of the bovine
iris. J Biomech 1999; 32 (9): 999-1003.
24. Fisher RF. The elastic constants of the human lens. J Physiol
1971; 212 (1): 147-180.
25. Bailey ST, Twa MD, Gump JC, Venkiteshwar M, Bullimore MA,
Sooryakumar R. Light scattering study of the normal human eye
lens: Elastic properties and age dependence. IEEE Trans Biomed
Eng 2010; 57 (12): 2910-2917.
26. Uchio E, Ohno S, Kudoh J, Aoki K, Kisielewicz LT. Simulation
model of an eyeball based on finite element analysis on a
supercomputer. British Journal of Ophthalmology 1999; 83 (10):
1106-1111
)