Document Type : Original Articles
Authors
1 Department of Orthotics and Prosthetics, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
2 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Abstract
Background:Nowadays, smartphones are equipped with an accelerometer module that can measure and record the body linear accelerations during walking. The aims of this study were: 1) reliability assessment of smartphone accelerometer for trunk accelerometry; 2) comparison of stability indices base on trunk accelerometry between the amputee and able-bodied subjects; and 3) comparison between energy storage and release (ESR) and multi-axis prosthetic feet users.
Methods: Eleven below-knee amputees (5 multi-axis and 6 ESR prosthetic feet) and 11 able-bodied subjects enrolled in this comparative study. The dynamic stability was assessed using a smartphone attached to their back through an elastic belt during walking in a 6-m walkway. Also, normalized root mean squares (nRMS) of mediolateral (ML) and anteroposterior (AP) directions were calculated as stability indices. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), SEM%, and Bland-Altman plots were used for reliability analysis. The Independent T-test was also used to compare the healthy and amputee subjects as well as ESR and multiaxis prosthetic feet users. The critical alpha was set at 0.05.
Results: The results showed that the accelerometer has the ICC values more than 0.97 and 0.89 for test-retest and inter-session, respectively. Amputees had significantly higher trunk accelerations in ML direction compared to able-bodied subjects (p=0.023) but not in AP direction (p=0.496). Although the results were not significant between ESR and multi-axis prosthetic feet (AP P= 0.16, ML P=0.44), the AP stability index was higher in ESR users (AP Multi-axis=117.45, ESR=127.38).
Conclusion: The smartphone can be used as a reliable measurement tool in clinical environments to assess the stability indices based on trunk accelerometry in transtibial amputees. More studies should be conducted to obtain more reliable results.
Keywords
- Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, Travison TG,
Brookmeyer R. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United
States: 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(3):422-9.
2. Ülger Ö, Topuz S, Bayramlar K, Erbahçeci F, Sener G. Risk
factors, frequency, and causes of falling in geriatric persons
who has had a limb removed by amputation. Topics in Geriatric
Rehabilitation. 2010;26(2):156-63.
3. Ku PX, Abu Osman NA, Wan Abas WA. Balance control in lower
extremity amputees during quiet standing: a systematic review.
Gait Posture. 2014;39(2):672-82.
4. Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement:
John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
5. Arifin N, Abu Osman NA, Ali S, Gholizadeh H, Wan Abas WA.
Evaluation of postural steadiness in below-knee amputees when
wearing different prosthetic feet during various sensory conditions
using the Biodex® Stability System. Proc Inst Mech Eng H.
2015;229(7):491-8.
6. Hansen A, Nickel E, Medvec J, Brielmaier S, Pike A, Weber M.
Effects of a flat prosthetic foot rocker section on balance and
mobility. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(1):137-48.
7. Arifin N, Abu Osman NA, Ali S, Gholizadeh H, Abas WA. Postural
stability characteristics of transtibial amputees wearing different
prosthetic foot types when standing on various support surfaces.
World Journal TS. 2014;:856279.
8. Miller WC, Speechley M, Deathe B. The prevalence and risk
factors of falling and fear of falling among lower extremity
amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(8):1031-7.
9. Panzenbeck JT, Klute GK. A powered inverting and everting
prosthetic foot for balance assistance in lower limb amputees.
JPO: Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics. 2012;24(4):175-80.
10. Kosse NM, Caljouw S, Vervoort D, Vuillerme N, Lamoth CJ.
Validity and Reliability of Gait and Postural Control Analysis
Using the Tri-axial Accelerometer of the iPod Touch. Ann Biomed
Eng. 2015;43(8):1935-46.
11. Major MJ, Fatone S, Roth EJ. Validity and reliability of the Berg
Balance Scale for community-dwelling persons with lower-limb
amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(11):2194-202.
12. Paradisi F, Di Stanislao E, Summa A, Brunelli S, Traballesi M,
Vannozzi G. Upper body accelerations during level walking in
transtibial amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019;43(2):204-212.
13. Moe-Nilssen R. Test-retest reliability of trunk accelerometry
during standing and walking. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
1998;79(11):1377-85.
14. Paradisi F, Delussu AS, Brunelli S, Iosa M, Pellegrini R, Zenardi
D, Traballesi M. The Conventional Non-Articulated SACH or a
Multiaxial Prosthetic Foot for Hypomobile Transtibial Amputees?
A Clinical Comparison on Mobility, Balance, and Quality of Life.
World Journal TS. 2015;261801.
15. Zijlstra W, Hof AL. Assessment of spatio-temporal gait parameters
from trunk accelerations during human walking. Gait Posture.
2003;18(2):1-10.
16. Iosa M, Paradisi F, Brunelli S, Delussu AS, Pellegrini R, Zenardi
D, Paolucci S, Traballesi M. Assessment of gait stability, harmony,
and symmetry in subjects with lower-limb amputation evaluated
by trunk accelerations. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(4):623-34.
17. Fleiss JL. Design and analysis of clinical experiments: John
Wiley & Sons; 2011.
18. Dudek FJ. The continuing misinterpretation of the standard error
of measurement. Psychological Bulletin. 1979;86(2):335.
19. Procházka A, Vyšata O, Charvátová H, Vališ M. Motion Symmetry
Evaluation Using Accelerometers and Energy Distribution.
Symmetry. 2019;11(7):871.
20. Lamoth CJ, Ainsworth E, Polomski W, Houdijk H. Variability
and stability analysis of walking of transfemoral amputees. Med Eng Phys. 2010;32(9):1009-14.
21. Lusardi MM, Jorge M, Nielsen CC. Orthotics and Prosthetics in
Rehabilitation E-Book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013.
22. Lenka P, Tiberwala DN. Effect of stump length on postural
steadiness during quiet stance in unilateral trans-tibial amputee.
Al Ameen J of Med Sci. 2010;3(1):50-7.
23. Quai TM, Brauer SG, Nitz JC. Somatosensation, circulation and
stance balance in elderly dysvascular transtibial amputees. Clin
Rehabil. 2005;19(6):668-76.
24. Seth M, Lamberg E. Standing balance in people with trans-tibial
amputation due to vascular causes: A literature review. Prosthet
Orthot Int. 2017;41(4):345-355.
25. Kamali M, Karimi MT, Eshraghi A, Omar H. Influential factors
in stability of lower-limb amputees. Am J Phys Med Rehabil.
2013;92(12):1110-8.
26. D’Andrea S, Wilhelm N, Silverman AK, Grabowski AM. Does
use of a powered ankle-foot prosthesis restore whole-body angular
momentum during walking at different speeds? Clin Orthop Relat
Res. 2014;472(10):3044-54.
27. Micó-Amigo ME, Kingma I, Faber GS, Kunikoshi A, van
Uem JMT, van Lummel RC, Maetzler W, van Dieën JH. Is the
Assessment of 5 Meters of Gait with a Single Body-Fixed-Sensor
Enough to Recognize Idiopathic Parkinson’s Disease-Associated
Gait? Ann Biomed Eng. 2017;45(5):1266-1278.
28. Howcroft J, Lemaire ED, Kofman J, Kendell C. Understanding
dynamic stability from pelvis accelerometer data and the
relationship to balance and mobility in transtibial amputees.
Gait Posture. 2015;41(3):808-12.
)