Document Type : Original Articles


Speech Therapy, Musculoskeletal Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran


Background: Valid assessment and validation indices are very important to evaluate and teach students, especially in clinical education settings. Considering the fact that rehabilitation science fields have about 1200 h of clinical education, planning of clinical skills training and how to evaluate them is important to improve the quality of education. Due to the importance of clinical skills teaching, clinical logbooks are used in various medical sciences in the world and some of the fields of medical sciences in Iran. This study was conducted to design and evaluate a clinical logbook for rehabilitation fields.Methods: Students [153] and trainers [43] surveys were conducted on how to evaluate clinical units. The clinical training logbooks of reputable rehabilitation universities of the world were studied and clinical activity logbooks for different rehabilitation fields were designed and administered in the clinical education and governance council meetings. Then, the level of satisfaction of trainers and students with the evaluation method was investigated using the logbook.Results: The results of this research showed a significant increase in students’ satisfaction with the assessment of internship and improvement of the quality of clinical education (above 80%) (P=0.02). Content validity results for the questionnaire were above 68% and Cronbach’s coefficient alpha was 75%.Conclusion: Given the similarity of internship courses throughout Iran, the logbook can be used in rehabilitation fields in the country by discipline to evaluate the clinical dimension of rehabilitation courses.


  1. Harden RM. Outcome-based education: the future is today. Medical teacher. 2007;29(7):625-9.
  2. Faux D. The Assessment Of Learning Outcomes For The Competent And Reflective Physician:: Amee Guide No. 25. Education for Primary Care. 2004;15(2):275.
  3. Komeili G, Rezai G. Methods of student assessment used by faculty members of basic medical sciences in Medical University of Zahedan. 2002.
  4. Calman L, Watson R, Norman I, Redfern S, Murrells T. Assessing practice of student nurses: methods, preparation of assessors and student views. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2002;38(5):516-23.
  5. Van Der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW. Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes. Medical education. 2005;39(3):309-17.
  6. Milligan F. Defining and assessing competence: the distraction of outcomes and the importance of educational process. Nurse education today. 1998;18(4):273-80.
  7. Alavi M, Irajpour AR, Abedi HA. Some concepts in the evaluation of clinical education: a qualitative study on the experiences of nursing students and clinical teachers. Strides in development of Medical Education. 2007;4(1):10-8.
  8. Bennett S, Bennett JW. The process of evidence‐based practice in occupational therapy: Informing clinical decisions. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal. 2000;47(4):171-80.
  9. Mok CK, Dodd B, Whitehill TL. Speech-language pathology students' approaches to learning in a problem-based learning curriculum. International journal of speech-language pathology. 2009;11(6):472-81.
  10. Malchiodi CA. Handbook of art therapy: Guilford Press; 2011.
  11. Raghoebar-Krieger H, Sleijfer D, Bender W, Stewart R, Popping R. The reliability of logbook data of medical students: an estimation of interobserver agreement, sensitivity and specificity. Medical Education-Oxford-. 2001;35(7):624-31.
  12. Heidari H, Akbari N. Developing and Implementing Log Book in Teaching Principles and Techniques to Nursing and Midwifery Students: Mixed Method Study. Future of Medical Education Journal. 2017;7(1):14-8.
  13. Lotfi M, Zamanzadeh V, Abdollahzadeh F, Seyyed RA, Jabbarzadeh F. The effect of using logbook on nursing students learning in gynecology wards. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2010.
  14. Tucker PD, Stronge JH. Linking teacher evaluation and student learning: ASCD; 2005.
  15. Norcini JJ, McKinley DW. Assessment methods in medical education. Teaching and teacher education. 2007;23(3):239-50.
  16. Hinchy J, Farmer E. Assessing general practice clinical decision making skills: the key features approach. Australian family physician. 2005;34(12):1059.
  17. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186-91.
  18. Moradi N, Pourshahbaz A, Soltani M, Javadipour S, Hashemi H, Soltaninejad N. Cross-cultural equivalence and evaluation of psychometric properties of voice handicap index into Persian. Journal of Voice. 2013;27(2):258. e15-. e22.
  19. Roshangar F, Lotfi M, Abdollahzadeh F, Davoodi A. The effect of using logbook on nursing students' learning. Iranian journal of medical education. 2010;10(1):64-70.