Document Type : Original Articles


Department of Physical Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences


Background: Due to the rotatory nature of the excessive subtalar pronation and the possible impairment of the tibial rotation-knee flexion mechanism, changes of the free moment (FM) and changes of the extensor mechanism force are expected in hyper-pronated foot subjects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between the FM applied on the lower extremity and the knee extensor mechanism force in subjects with flexible pronated feet.Methods: Fifteen asymptomatic female subjects (21.32±1.66 y, 56.30±6.08 kg, 159±6.3 cm) participated in the study. Excessive subtalar pronation was determined by measuring the resting calcaneal stance position (RCSP) in the frontal plane during weight bearing. A neutrally aligned foot was defined as having an RCSP between 2° of inversion and 2° of eversion. On the other hand, a flat foot had an RCSP of more than or equal to 4° of eversion. Both kinetic and kinematic data were collected using a six-camera motion analysis system and a single force plate. Three successful barefoot walking trials were recorded at self-selected speeds. The extensor mechanism force and the adductory component of the free moment (ADD FM) were calculated. The correlation between the ADD FM and the knee extensor mechanism force was examined using the Pearson correlation test.Results: The Pearson correlation analysis showed a high positive correlation between the ADD FM and the extensor mechanism force (r=0.917, P<0.001).Conclusion: Excessive subtalar pronation, along with a possible impairment of the tibial rotation-knee flexion mechanism, may affect the extensor mechanism force at the knee joint.From a clinical perspective, the possible biomechanical linkage between the knee and the foot complex in the physical examination and treatment of patients should be considered.


  1. Close J, Inman V, Poor P, Todd F. The Function of the Subtalar Joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1967;50:159-80.
  2. Karatsolis K, Nikolopoulos C, Papadopoulos E, Vagenas G, Terzis E, Athanasopoulos S. Eversion and inversion muscle group peak torque in hyperpronated and normal individuals. The Foot 2009;19(1):29-35.
  3. Pohl MB, Messenger N, Buckley JG. Forefoot, rearfoot and shank coupling: effect of variations in speed and mode of gait. Gait posture 2007;25(2):295-302.
  4. Duval K, Lam T, Sanderson D. The mechanical relationship between the rearfoot, pelvis and low-back. Gait posture 2010;32(4):637-40.
  5. Dunn J, Link C, Felson D, Crincoli M, Keysor J, McKinlay J. Prevalence of foot and ankle conditions in a multiethnic community sample of older adults. Am J Epidemiol 2004;159(5):491-8.
  6. Shibuya N, Jupiter DC, Ciliberti LJ, VanBuren V, La Fontaine J. Characteristics of adult flatfoot in the United States. J Foot Ankle Surg 2010;49(4):363-8.
  7. Tateuchi H, Wada O, Ichihashi N. Effects of calcaneal eversion on three-dimensional kinematics of the hip, pelvis and thorax in unilateral weight bearing. Hum Mov Sci 2011;30(3):566-73.
  8. Tiberio D. The effect of excessive subtalar joint pronation on patellofemoral mechanics: a theoretical model. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1987;9(4):160-5.
  9. DeLeo AT, Dierks TA, Ferber R, Davis IS. Lower extremity joint coupling during running: a current update. Clin Biomech 2004;19(10):983-91.
  10. Duffey MJ, Martin DF, Cannon DW, Craven T, Messier SP. Etiologic factors associated with anterior knee pain in distance runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000;32(11):1825-32.
  11. Nigg BM, Cole GK, Nachbauer W. Effects of arch height of the foot on angular motion of the lower extremities in running. J Biomech 1993;26(8):909-16.
  12. Messier SP, Pittala KA. Etiologic factors associated with selected running injuries. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1988;20(5):501-5.
  13. Powers CM, Chen P-Y, Reischl SF, Perry J. Comparison of foot pronation and lower extremity rotation in persons with and without patellofemoral pain. Foot Ankle Int 2002;23(7):634-40.
  14. Hetsroni I, Finestone A, Milgrom C, Sira DB, Nyska M, Radeva-Petrova D, et al. A prospective biomechanical study of the association between foot pronation and the incidence of anterior knee pain among military recruits. Bone Joint J 2006;88(7):905-8.
  15. Cobb SC, Tis LL, Johnson JT, Geil MD, McCarty FA. The effect of low-mobile foot posture on multi-segment medial foot model gait kinematics. Gait posture 2009;30(3):334-9.
  16. Houck JR, Tome JM, Nawoczenski DA. Subtalar neutral position as an offset for a kinematic model of the foot during walking. Gait posture 2008;28(1):29-37.
  17. Hunt AE, Smith RM. Mechanics and control of the flat versus normal foot during the stance phase of walking. Clin Biomech 2004;19(4):391-7.
  18. Chuter VH. Research Relationships between foot type and dynamic rearfoot frontal plane motion. J Foot Ankle Res 2010;3(9):1-6.
  19. Barton CJ, Levinger P, Crossley KM, Webster KE, Menz HB. Relationships between the Foot Posture Index and foot kinematics during gait in individuals with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Foot Ankle Res 2011;4(1):1-8.
  20. Neal BS, Griffiths IB, Dowling GJ, Murley GS, Munteanu SE, Smith MMF, et al. Foot posture as a risk factor for lower limb overuse injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Res 2014;7(1):1.
  21. Powers CM, Lilley JC, Lee TQ. The effects of axial and multi-plane loading of the extensor mechanism on the patellofemoral joint. Clin Biomech 1998;13(8):616-24.
  22. Khan W, Nokes L, Jones R, Johnson D. The relationship of the angle of immobilisation of the knee to the force applied to the extensor mechanism when partially weight-bearing A gait –analysis study in normal volunteers. J Bone Joint Surg br 2007;89(7):911-4.
  23. Milner CE, Davis IS, Hamill J. Free moment as a predictor of tibial stress fracture in distance runners. J Biomech 2006;39(15):2819-25.
  24. Yazdani F, Razeghi M, Ebrahimi S. A comparison of the free moment pattern between normal and hyper-pronated feet female subjects during the stance phase of gait. J Biomed Phys Eng. (In Press)
  25. Donatelli RA. Normal anatomy and biomechanics. In: Donatelli RA, editor. The biomechanics of the foot and ankle. Philadelphia: .A.David Company: 1990.p.3-31.
  26. Smith-Oricchio K, Harris BA. Interrater reliability of subtalar neutral, calcaneal inversion and eversion. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1990;12(1):10-5.
  27. Song J, Hillstrom H, Secord D, Levitt J. Foot type biomechanics. comparison of planus and rectus foot types. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1996;86(1):16-23.
  28. Razeghi M, Batt ME. Foot type classification: a critical review of current methods. Gait posture. 2002;15(3):282-91.
  29. Feiss HO. A simple method of the estimating the common variations and deformities of the foot. Am J Med Sci 1909;138(2):213-30.
  30. Hannigan-Downs K, Harter R, Smith G. Radiographic validation and reliability of selected clinical measures of pronation. J Ath Tr 2000;35:12-30.
  31. Giallonardo LM. Clinical evaluation of foot and ankle dysfunction. Phys Ther 1988;68(12):1850-6.
  32. Spörndly-Nees S, Dåsberg B, Nielsen RO, Boesen MI, Langberg H. The navicular position test- a reliable measure of the navicular bone position during rest and loading. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2011;6(3):199.
  33. Wilken JM, Rodriguez KM, Brawner M, Darter BJ. Reliability and minimal detectible change values for gait kinematics and kinetics in healthy adults. Gait posture 2012;35(2):301-7.
  34. Sadeghi H, Allard P, Prince F, Labelle H. Symmetry and limb dominance in able-bodied gait: a review. Gait posture 2000;12(1):34-45.
  35. Holden JP, Cavanagh PR. The free moment of ground reaction in distance running and its changes with pronation. J Biomech 1991;24(10):887-97.
  36. Kistler Corporation. Kistler Force Plate Formulae. Kistler Instrumente AG Winterthur, Switzerland. 2008.
  37. Yamaguchi GT, Zajac FE. A planar model of the knee joint to characterize the knee extensor mechanism. J Biomech 1989;22(1):1-10.
  38. Bressel E. The influence of ergometer pedaling direction on peak patellofemoral joint forces. Clin Biomech 2001;16(5):431-7.