Document Type : Original Articles

Authors

Tarbiat modares University

Abstract

Background: Patellar mal tracking is responsible for pain and disability in patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). Patellar kinesio taping may have different effects on short and long term usage. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of short term and long term patellar kinesio taping in patellar position on women with patellofemoral pain syndrome using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).Methods: Thirty women with a mean age of 32.2 ± 6.18 years with one year history of PFPS participated in this study. All participants provided written, informed consent. MRI was taken three times from participant’s patellofemoral joint: 1) Without taping, 2) Immediately after taping in the first session, 3) After 10 sessions of taping. The effectiveness of the interventions was determined by measuring the patellofemoral congruence angle (PFCA), lateral patellofemoral angle (LPFA), and lateral patellar displacement (LPD) on MRI images.Results: Statistical analysis showed that utilizing kinesio taping in short time and after 10 sessions, significantly changed PFCA and LPD – except for PFCA after 10 sessions. Moreover, taping didn’t have any significant effect to alter LPFA.Conclusion: In short term, mechanical effects of kinesio taping influenced the patella position but in long term, neuromuscular effects may be more effective than each one separately to alter patella position.

Keywords

  1. Naseri N. Physiotherapy in orthopedic disorder.2nd ed. sobh-esaadat. 1384.
  2. Powers CM, Landel R, Sosnick T,et al. The effect of patellar taping on stride characteristics and joint motion in subjects with PFPS.J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 1997; 26: 286-91.
  3. Piniella. Iliotibial band tightness and medial patellar glide in patient with patellofemoral dysfunction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther1993; 17(3):144-8.
  4. Neumann DA. Kinesiology of the musculoskeletal system, foundation for physical rehabilitation.1st ed. 2004.
  5. Connolly KD. Differences in patellofemoral contact mechanics associated with patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Biomechanics 2009; 42:2802-7.
  6. Wen-ChiChen. Effects of Kinesio taping on the timing and ratio of Vastus medialis oblique and Vastus lateralis muscle for person with patellofemoral pain. J Biomechanics 2007;40 (4):318.
  7. Ingersoll. Patellar location changes following EMG biofeedback or progressive resistive exercises. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991; 10(23):p.1122-7.
  8. McDonald R. Tapingtechniques.2nd ed. London. 2004.
  9. Christou E. Patellar taping increases VMO activity in the presence of patellofemoral pain. J Electromyography Kinesio 2004; 14: 495-504.
  10. Salsich GB, Brechter JH, Farwell D, Powers CM. The effects of patellar taping on knee kinetics, kinematics and VLactivity during stair ambulation in individuals with PFPS. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 2004; 32:3-10.
  11. Cowan SM, Bennell KL, Hodgos PW. Therapeutic patellar taping changes the timing of VM activation in people with PFPS. Clin J Sport Med 2002; 12: 339-47.
  12. Aminaka N, Gribble PA. Patellar taping, patellofemoral pain syndrome, lower extremity kinematics, and dynamic postural control. J Athl Train 2008; 43(1):21-8.
  13. Gigante A. The effects of patellar taping on patellofemoral incongruence: a computed tomography study. Am J Sport Med 2001; 29:88-92.
  14. Herington L. The effect of patellar taping on quadriceps strength and functional performance in normal subjects. Phys Ther Sport 2004; 5:33-6.
  15. Crossly K. Patellar taping: is clinical success supported by scientific evidence? Manual Ther 2000; 5(3):142-50.
  16. Tieh-Cheng F. Effect of Kinesio taping on muscle strength in athletes-a pilot study.J Sci Med Sport 2007; 11:198-201.
  17. Keet HL. The effect of medial patellar taping on pain, strength and neuromuscular recruitment in subjects with and without patellofemoral pain. Physiotherapy 2007; 93:.45-52.
  18. Bockrath K, Wooden C,Worrell T, Ingersoll CD, Farr J ,Farr. Effects of patellar taping on patella position and perceived pain. Med Sci Sport Exerc 1993; 25:989-92.
  19. YFNG G, Cheng J MF. The effect of patellar taping on pain and neuromuscular performance in subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Clin Rehab 2002; 16:821-827.
  20. Doucette SA. The effect of open and closed chain exercise and knee joint position on patellar tracking in lateral patellar compression syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1996; 2(23):104-10.
  21. Pfeiffer RP, DeBeliso M, Shea KG, Kelley L, Irmischer B, Chad H. Kinematic MRI assessment of McConnell taping before and after exercise. Am J Sport Med 2004; 32(3):621-7.
  22. Guner S, Alsancak S, Koz M. Effect of two different Kinesio taping techniques on knee kinematics and kinetics in young females J phys Ther Sci 2015;27:3093–3096.
  23. Halseth T, McChesney JW, Debeliso M, et al. The effects of kinesio™ taping on proprioception at the ankle. J Sports Sci Med 2004; 3:1–7.