Document Type : Original Articles
Authors
1 Biostatistics Department, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
2 Biostatistics Department, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran/ Instructor of Biostatistics, Sirjan School of Medical Sciences. Sirjan, Iran
3 Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Abstract
Background: Occupational therapy outcomes for motor improvement are
different among the children with cerebral palsy to determine the effective
factors related to gross motor achievement in the children with Cerebral palsy
(CP), the present project was designed.
Methods: In a quasi-experimental study, 59 CP patients with Gross Motor
Function Classification System (GMFCS) 1-4 were evaluated by Gross Motor
Function Measure (GMFM). They were referred to four centers in Shiraz, Iran,
in 2015. Results of therapy were monitoring five times during six months for
each participant, according to achievement to stages of GMFM, and marginal
modeling method was utilized.
Results: The results revealed the significance of some factors including, age at
starting occupational therapy services, number of sessions per week, type of
spastic, level four of socio economic status (SES), grade two of GMFCS, and time
effect on the outcome (upgrade to a higher level on each occasion) (p <0.05).
Conclusion: Based on the odds ratio (OR) values, the number of occupational
therapy sessions per week had the most positive effect on gross motor function
upgrade for at least two half times. Age at starting occupational therapy service
was the second important factor in the outcome. However, spending more time
for therapy and early starting relates to family characteristics and also financial
support.
Keywords
2. Chiarello LA, Palisano RJ, Bartlett DJ, McCoy SW. A multivariate model of determinants of change in gross-motor abilities and engagement in self-care and play of young children with cerebral palsy. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2011;31(2):150-68.
3. Palisano RJ, Walter SD, Russell DJ, Rosenbaum PL, Gémus M,Galuppi BE, et al. Gross motor function of children with Down syndrome: creation of motor growth curves. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(4):494-500.
4. Dehghanizadeh M, Akbarfahimi M, Zareiyan A, Yazdani F,Khalafbeigi M, Soleimani F. Predictors of Interest in Performing Activities Among Iranian Adolescents With Cerebral Palsy. Iran Rehabil J. 2020;18(4):377-86.
5. Alotaibi M, Long T, Kennedy E, Bavishi S. The efficacy of GMFM-88 and GMFM-66 to detect changes in gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy (CP): a literature review. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(8):617-27.
6. Bartlett DJ, Chiarello LA, Mccoy SW, Palisano RJ, Jeffries L,Fiss AL, et al. Determinants of gross motor function of young children with cerebral palsy: a prospective cohort study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014;56(3):275-82.
7. Bartlett DJ, Palisano RJ. A multivariate model of determinants of motor change for children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 2000;80(6):598-614.
8. Park E-Y, Kim W-H. Structural equation modeling of motor impairment, gross motor function, and the functional outcome in children with cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34(5):1731-9.
9. Huang H-C, Chung K-C, Lai D-C, Sung S-F. The impact of timing and dose of rehabilitation delivery on functional recovery of stroke patients. Chin Med J (Engl). 2009;72(5):257-64.
10. Taylor NF, Dodd KJ, McBurney H, Graham HK. Factors influencing adherence to a home-based strength-training programme for young people with cerebral palsy. Physiotherapy.2004;90(2):57-63.
11. Charles JR, Wolf SL, Schneider JA, Gordon AM. Efficacy of a child-friendly form of constraint-induced movement therapy in hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a randomized control trial. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48(8):635-42.
12. Dehghanizadeh M, Khalafbeigi M, Akbarfahimi M, Yazdani F, Zareiyan A. Exploring the contributing factors that influence the volition of adolescents with cerebral palsy: A directed content analysis. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020:1-11.
13. Russell DJ, Rosenbaum PL, Cadman DT, Gowland C, Hardy S, Jarvis S. The gross motor function measure: a means to evaluate the effects of physical therapy. Dev Med Child Neurol.1989;31(3):341-52.
14. Carrière I, Bouyer J. Choosing marginal or random-effects models for longitudinal binary responses: application to selfreported disability among older persons. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002;2(1):1-10.
15. Twisk JW. Longitudinal data analysis. A comparison between generalized estimating equations and random coefficient analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2004;19(8):769-76.
16. Pollard V. Neuromotor and Cognitive Development in Children with Cerebral Palsy in Relation to Neural Plasticity. McCabe Thesis Collection. 2001:34.
17. Wittenberg GF. Experience, cortical remapping, and recovery in brain disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2010;37(2):252-8.
18. Dalvand H, Dehghan L, Hadian MR, Feizy A, Hosseini SA. Relationship between gross motor and intellectual function in children with cerebral palsy: a cross-sectional study. Arch PhysMed Rehabil. 2012;93(3):480-4.
19. Hess CR, Teti DM, Hussey-Gardner B. Self-efficacy and parenting of high-risk infants: The moderating role of parent knowledge of infant development. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2004;25(4):423-37.
20. Huang K-Y, Caughy MOB, Genevro JL, Miller TL. Maternal knowledge of child development and quality of parenting among White, African-American and Hispanic mothers. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2005;26(2):149-70.
21. Buitrago JA, Bolaños AM, Caicedo Bravo E. A motor learning therapeutic intervention for a child with cerebral palsy through a social assistive robot. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15(3):357-62.
22. Palisano RJ, Begnoche DM, Chiarello LA, Bartlett DJ, McCoy SW, Chang H-J. Amount and focus of physical therapy and occupational therapy for young children with cerebral palsy. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2012;32(4):368-82.
23. Raina P, O’donnell M, Rosenbaum P, Brehaut J, Walter SD, Russell D, et al. The health and well-being of caregivers of children with cerebral palsy. Pediatrics. 2005;115(6):e626-e36.
24. Damiano D, Abel M, Romness M, Oeffinger D, Tylkowski C, Gorton G, et al. Comparing functional profiles of children with hemiplegic and diplegic cerebral palsy in GMFCS Levels I and II: Are separate classifications needed? Dev Med ChildNeurol. 2006;48(10):797-803.
25. Huang H-H, Sun T-H, Lin C-I, Chen Y-R. Contextual Factors and mastery motivation in young children with and without cerebral Palsy: a Systematic Review. Front Pediatr. 2017;5:224.